Could it be that Harriet Harman's recent comments in Government, as a Solicitor, constitute an offence against the Solicitors professional rules? In her recent interviews on the topic of Sir Fred Goodwin's pension pot she stated:
"The Prime Minister has said it's not acceptable, therefore it will not be accepted. It might be enforceable in a court of law but it's not acceptable in the court of public opinion, therefore the government will take action."
It is a paramount duty of all solicitors to uphold the rule of law in their capacity as Solicitors of the Supreme Court. Harriet's comments certainly seem to imply an entirely new court, that of public opinion, which of course has no constitutional basis.
So is the intention to flout the law, or the public decrying of it, an actionable matter? Perhaps being an important Government Minister should mean different rules apply? No doubt the Solicitors Regulation Authority will be knocking on Harriet's door any day now - if not for any real purpose at least for the look of the thing!